Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Miles v. Garland et al
as 4:2023cv04193
Plaintiff:
Harry Edwin Miles
Defendant:
Merrick B Garland, Dara L Darrow, Joe Billy McDade and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Norman v. Northwest Indiana (Section 8) et al
as 2:2021cv00350
Plaintiff:
laSandra Norman
Defendant:
Theresa L. Springmann, Diane P. Wood, William J. Bauer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ATKINS v. SYKES et al
as 1:2021cv02161
Plaintiff:
REBEKAH A. ATKINS
Defendant:
DIANE S. SYKES, WILLIAM J. BAUER, JOEL M. FLAUM and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Borzych, Garry v. Lund, Kenneth et al
as 3:2020cv00117
Defendant:
Frank H. Easterbrook, Terence T. Evans, Michael Y. Scudder and others
Plaintiff:
Garry A. Borzych
Not Classified By Court:
WCI Prison Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Borzych, Garry v. Lund, Kenneth et al
as 3:2019cv00521
Defendant:
Frank H. Easterbrook, Terence T. Evans, William C. Griesbach and others
Plaintiff:
Garry A. Borzych
Not Yet Classified:
WCI Prison Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davenport v. Flaum et al
as 1:2019cv00535
Defendant:
Frank H. Easterbrook, Joel L. Flaum and Amy C. Barrett
Plaintiff:
Louise Davenport
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bodie Witzlib v. Frank Easterbrook, et al
as 17-3400
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BODIE BYRON WITZLIB
Defendant - Appellee:
FRANK H. EASTERBROOK, DIANE S. SYKES and RICHARD A. POSNER
Darryl Conway v. Michael Reagan, et al
as 15-2801
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DARRYL A. CARLOS CONWAY
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL J. REAGAN, Judge, THOMAS V. GAINER, Judge, DAVID F. HAMILTON, Judge and others
Love EL v. Easterbrook et al
as 1:2015cv03881
Plaintiff:
Sheik L Love EL
Defendant:
Frank H. Easterbrook, Ruben Castillo, Robert M. Dow, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv00107
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
