Cases 1 - 10 of 103
Julian v. Conley et al
as 3:2024cv50198
Plaintiff:
Ethin Julian
Defendant:
Sgt. Conley, Sgt. Park, Oswalt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FARRIS D v. REAGLE et al
as 1:2023cv01632
Plaintiff:
JOHN FARRIS D and JOHN D. FARRIS
Defendant:
DENNIS REAGLE and CHRISTINA REAGLR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Farris v. Franklin Co. Jail
as 3:2023cv03030
Petitioner:
Allen M. Farris
Respondent:
Franklin Co. Jail
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
RMR Home Solutions LLC et al v. Farris
as 1:2023cv07228
Plaintiff:
RMR Home Solutions LLC d/b/a ProTaxAppeal and Rick Robin
Defendant:
Daniel Farris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Farris v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2023cv01148
Plaintiff:
Richard Farris
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security - Office of the General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01415
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Frohwerk v. Jackson et al
as 3:2023cv00159
Defendant:
Farri Jones, Lorraine Lynn Jackson, Farri Xhosma and others
Plaintiff:
David Frohwerk
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BRENNER v. ELROD et al
as 3:2023cv00019
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW C. BRENNER
Defendant:
MATTHEW R. ELROD, FARRIS, PHAR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Farris v. Hopkins et al
as 3:2023cv00375
Plaintiff:
Allen M. Farris
Defendant:
Aaron M. Hopkins, Franklin County Jail, Kenny and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-3183
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
