Cases 1 - 10 of 31
Few v. San Jose Police Dept. et al
as 1:2024cv03832
Plaintiff:
Jenessia Few
Defendant:
San Jose Police Dept., Cynthia Beltran-Hahn, Trent Tessler and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Ernest Coffey v. John Baldwin, et al
as 19-1546
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ERNEST COFFEY
Defendant / Appellee:
SYLVIA MAHONE, ROBERTA FEWS, Deputy Diretor of Department of Corrections, MELVIN HINTON, Chief of Mental Health and Psychiatric Services and others
Williams v. Walker et al
as 1:2017cv01470
Plaintiff:
Jared W Williams
Defendant:
Roger E Walker, Roberta Fews, Wendy . Navarro and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lisle v. Baldwin et al
as 1:2017cv01158
Plaintiff:
Steven D Lisle, Jr
Defendant:
John R Baldwin, Melvin Hinton, Roberta Fews and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McWilliams v. Baldwin et al
as 1:2017cv01096
Plaintiff:
Rahim McWilliams
Defendant:
John R. Baldwin, Roberta Fews, Wendy Wavarro and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coffey v. Walker et al
as 1:2015cv01369
Plaintiff:
Ernest Coffey
Defendant:
Roger E Walker, Jr, Roberta Fews, Melvin Hinton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clark v. Walker Jr et al
as 1:2015cv01306
Plaintiff:
Daniel Clark
Defendant:
Roger Walker Jr, Roberta Fews, Melvin Hinton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
POTTS et al v. DART TRANSIT COMPANY et al
as 1:2014cv01652
Defendant:
DART TRANSIT COMPANY and ROBERT T. FEW
Plaintiff:
KATHY S POTTS and WILLIAM T POTTS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Ordex et al v. Sanctioned Few LEMC, Inc.
as 1:2014cv00743
Plaintiff:
Rosa M Ordex, Paul Garcia and Carlos Garcia
Defendant:
Sanctioned Few LEMC, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Hunter v. Sood et al
as 1:2013cv02569
Plaintiff:
Antonio Hunter
Defendant:
Kul Sood, S.A. Godinez, Roberta Fews and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
