Cases 1 - 10 of 90
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03854
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Carr v. Zoerner et al
as 2:2024cv00444
Plaintiff:
ArQuincy Lee Carr
Defendant:
David Zoerner, DSO Aker, DSO Molinaro and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv50382
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv15001
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Galvan-Marcelo v. Lammer
as 3:2023cv50365
Petitioner:
Juan Carlos Galvan-Marcelo
Respondent:
B. Lammer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Galvan v. Weem, LLC
as 1:2023cv14391
Plaintiff:
Michelle Galvan
Defendant:
Weem, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Lopez Galvan v. Abbott Laboratories et al
as 1:2023cv05114
Plaintiff:
Rosa Lopez Galvan
Defendant:
Abbott Laboratories, MEAD JOHNSON & COMPANY, LLC and MEAD JOHNSON NUTRITION COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Ramos v. Dick's Sporting Goods, Inc.
as 1:2023cv04979
Plaintiff:
Maria Galvan Ramos
Defendant:
Dick's Sporting Goods, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Galvan v. Switski et al
as 1:2023cv03158
Plaintiff:
John Galvan
Defendant:
Victor Switski, James Hanrahan, Leroy Almanza and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Galvan v. Todo Auto Repair, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv00135
Plaintiff:
Jose Luis Galvan
Defendant:
Todo Auto Repair, Inc. and Jacobo Sarabia
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
