Cases 1 - 10 of 2,309
GREGORY II v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv01638
Plaintiff:
JAMES W. GREGORY II
Defendant:
MARTIN O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00493
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
LAMOND v. USA
as 1:2024cv01255
Petitioner:
JOHN E. LAMOND, II
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
FIELDS, II v. SKINNER et al
as 1:2024cv01630
Defendant:
DAWN JOHNSON and TONY SKINNER
Plaintiff:
GREGORY P. FIELDS, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ANDERSON v. LOGANSPORT STATE HOSPITAL
as 1:2024cv01612
Plaintiff:
PRINCESS CALIFIA HATUN TUPAK BEY II and DEJAUNE L. ANDERSON
Defendant:
LOGANSPORT STATE HOSPITAL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00491
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Herrejon v. Varga et al
as 4:2024cv04166
Defendant:
Amber Allen, John Doe, . Cole and others
Plaintiff:
Jorge Herrejon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PRINCESS CALLIFIA HATUN TUPAK BEY II A/K/A DEJAUNE ANDERSON v. LOGANSPORT STATE HOSPITAL
as 1:2024cv01576
Defendant:
LOGANSPORT STATE HOSPITAL
Plaintiff:
PRINCESS CALLIFIA HATUN TUPAK BEY II A/K/A DEJAUNE ANDERSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BOARDS v. MUSSON ET AL
as 1:2024cv01556
Defendant:
DALTON BALLARD, ROBERT PONTIUS, ERIC LORD and others
Plaintiff:
CARL R WEBB II BOARDS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BOARDS v. AK ET AL
as 1:2024cv01581
Plaintiff:
CARL R WEBB II BOARDS
Defendant:
AK and INTERNAL INVESTIGATION OFFICER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
