Cases 1 - 10 of 28,764
Banks v. Jeffreys et al
as 2:2024cv02153
Plaintiff:
Michael S Banks
Defendant:
Rob Jeffreys, Wexford Health Sources Inc, LaToya Hughes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SMITH v. WADAS
as 2:2024cv00330
Petitioner:
MARCUS SMITH
Respondent:
J. WADAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Gregg, LeAnder v. Knudson, Scott et al
as 3:2024cv00430
Plaintiff:
LeAnder J. Gregg
Defendant:
Sheriff Scott Knudson, Sergeant Richard Westphal, Sergeant Naomi Sieben and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jenkins, Misti v. O'Malley, Martin
as 3:2024cv00427
Plaintiff:
Misti A. Jenkins
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Buchanan v. Hanley et al
as 1:2024cv05352
Plaintiff:
Markus Buchanan
Defendant:
J. Hanley, Kwame Raoul and Thomas Klein
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Love v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv05347
Plaintiff:
Jacquelyn R. Love
Defendant:
Commissioner Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Vasquez, Jr. v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv05333
Plaintiff:
Ladislao Vasquez, Jr.
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Miller v. Cunningham et al
as 3:2024cv01597
Plaintiff:
Terrence L Miller
Defendant:
Mrs. Cunningham, L Luking, Rebecca Riggs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ratliff v. Wexford Health Sources Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv01598
Plaintiff:
Ryan Ratliff
Defendant:
Wexford Health Sources Inc., Rob Jeffreys, J. B. Pritzker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PLATO v. SEVIER
as 1:2024cv01081
Petitioner:
ROBERT J. PLATO
Respondent:
MARK SEVIER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
