Cases 1 - 10 of 4,313
Koker v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv01210
Defendant:
Martin J O'Malley
Plaintiff:
Melody B Koker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Namesnik v. Deister et al
as 2:2024cv01198
Defendant:
Kevin J. Degen, Gregg Garvey, Liam Mackay and others
Plaintiff:
Brent Namesnik
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Namesnik v. Deister et al
as 1:2024cv01198
Defendant:
Harbor Diversified Inc, Gregg Garvey, Liam Mackay and others
Plaintiff:
Brent Namesnik
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Knickerbocker v. State of Wisconsin et al
as 1:2024cv01189
Defendant:
Vincent R Biskupic, William Atkinson, Chuck Stertz and others
Plaintiff:
Steven G Knickerbocker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pevonka, Jean v. O'Malley, Martin
as 3:2024cv00655
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Plaintiff:
Jean Pevonka
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Cain v. County of Milwaukee et al
as 2:2024cv01173
Defendant:
County of Milwaukee, Tamara J Dodge, Genworth Life and Annuity and others
Plaintiff:
Lance Cain, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Padilla v. Judge
as 2:2024cv01165
Petitioner:
Philip J Padilla
Respondent:
Michael T Judge
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rucker v. Severson et al
as 2:2024cv01170
Defendant:
Waukesha County Sheriff's Department Staff and Eric J Severson
Plaintiff:
Eric T Rucker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ruppa v. Window Solutions Inc
as 2:2024cv01161
Plaintiff:
Anderson J. Ruppa
Defendant:
Window Solutions, Inc. d/b/a Renewal by Andersen of Greater WI & Milwaukee
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Hyatt v. Evers et al
as 2:2024cv01162
Defendant:
Tim Malchow, James Schwochert, Cindy O'Donnell and others
Plaintiff:
Jason J Hyatt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
