Cases 1 - 10 of 53
COOK v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2023cv00891
Plaintiff:
JAMES C. COOK
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00185
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Classified By Court:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Silcox v. Warden
as 3:2022cv00929
Petitioner:
James C Silcox
Respondent:
Warden
Not Classified By Court:
WESTVILLE E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ABEL JR. v. MODESTO et al
as 1:2022cv01694
Plaintiff:
KENDALE EUGENE ABEL JR.
Defendant:
NICHOLAS MODESTO, JAMES C. HURT and ROGER SPURGEON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roberts v Norfolk Southern Corporation
as 3:2022cv00495
Defendant:
James C Robert, Norfolk Southern Corporation and Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Plaintiff:
James C Roberts
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Silcox v. Hyiatt et al
as 3:2022cv00468
Plaintiff:
James C Silcox and James Silcox
Defendant:
William Hyiatt, Cannon and S Nelson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CONROAD ASSOCIATES. L.P. v. CASTLETON CORNER OWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC. et al
as 1:2022cv00750
Plaintiff:
CONROAD ASSOCIATES. L.P.
Defendant:
CASTLETON CORNER OWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC., AT CASTLETON IN OWNER, LLC, AT CASTLETON IN ASSOCIATION MANAGER, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
BURCH v. SAUL
as 2:2020cv00434
Defendant:
ANDREW M. SAUL
Plaintiff:
JAMES C. BURCH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
MAY v. JONES et al
as 1:2020cv01023
Defendant:
JONES and WENDY KNIGHT
Plaintiff:
JAMES C. MAY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ALVEY v. GRIFFIN
as 3:2020cv00026
Respondent:
KATHY ALVEY
Petitioner:
JAMES C. GRIFFIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
