Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Velt Boyz Entertainment, LLC et al
as 3:2022cv02735
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Defendant:
Velt Boyz Entertainment, LLC, Ebony Jones and James Edward Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
JONES et al v. U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
as 1:2022cv01317
Plaintiff:
JAMES E. JONES and KIMBERLY D. GRAY-JONES
Defendant:
U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 dp Fed. Question: Violation of Due Process
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00049
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Jones, Jr. v. Valparaiso Community School Corporation et al
as 2:2021cv00370
Plaintiff:
James R. Jones, Jr.
Defendant:
Valparaiso Community School Corporation, Principal Loren Hershberger, Chief Jeffrey Balon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. JONES
as 1:2021cv00659
Defendant:
JAMES ROLAND JONES
Plaintiff:
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
Jones v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2020cv02246
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
James D. Jones and James D Jones
Interested Party:
CSS-Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Jones v. Hammers et al
as 1:2020cv01138
Defendant:
Cherryle Hinthorne and Justin Hammers
Plaintiff:
James Antonio Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv00166
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv00405
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv00373
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
