Cases 1 - 10 of 31
KING v. USA
as 1:2024cv00289
Petitioner:
CLIFFORD R. KING, JR.
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
King v. Brightmark LLC
as 1:2022cv00364
Plaintiff:
Douglas B King and Douglas B King, Jr
Defendant:
Brightmark LLC and Brightmark Energy LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
King, Jr. v. Bergami
as 3:2022cv50181
Petitioner:
Sherond Duron King, Jr.
Respondent:
Mr. Bergami
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
King, Jr. v. Yuhas et al
as 1:2022cv01800
Plaintiff:
Roy D. King, Jr.
Defendant:
Yuhas and Will County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Freitag v. Kinser et al
as 1:2022cv00953
Plaintiff:
Roy Delane King Jr. and Lisa Marie Freitag
Defendant:
Lisa Kinser, Kinser Law, Inc. and River Valley Justice Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
King Jr. v. Kinser et al
as 1:2022cv00742
Plaintiff:
Roy Delane King Jr.
Defendant:
Lisa Kinser, Kinser Law, Inc. and River Valley Justice Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
King Jr. v. Perell et al
as 1:2022cv00560
Plaintiff:
Roy Delane King Jr.
Defendant:
Perell, Will County Sheriff Office, Will County Court House and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
King, Jr. v. Lockport Police Department et al
as 1:2022cv00433
Plaintiff:
Roy D. King, Jr.
Defendant:
Lockport Police Department, Joliet Police Department, Will County Sheriffs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KING v. BRANHAM et al
as 1:2021cv03008
Plaintiff:
ROGER S. KING, JR.
Defendant:
MIKE BRANHAM, ANDREW VERBOCHT, JOHN COCHRAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
USA v. Clifford King, Jr.
as 21-3056
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
CLIFFORD R. KING, JR.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
