Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Smith v. Truitt
as 1:2022cv05747
Petitioner:
Keenon Smith
Respondent:
Charles Truitt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Keenon v. Arrendondo, et al
as 1:2022cv05499
Plaintiff:
BIANCA KEENON
Defendant:
JOSE ARRENDONDO, REEK EXPRESS, INC., a Foreign Corporation and Reek Express, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
GAINES LAND GROUP, LLC v. CHUCK CALLAHAN FORD, INC. et al
as 1:2022cv01636
Plaintiff:
GAINES LAND GROUP, LLC
Defendant:
CHUCK CALLAHAN FORD, INC., CALLAHAN REALTY CO., INC., CIL, INC. and others
Interested Party:
RONALD C. SMITH and STOLL KEENON OGDEN PLLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9607 Real Property Tort to Land
Farr v. Warden of Marion USP et al
as 3:2020cv00808
Plaintiff:
Keenon J. Farr
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons and Warden of Marion USP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Farr v. USA
as 3:2018cv02040
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Keenon J Farr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Farr v. Werlich
as 3:2018cv01180
Petitioner:
Keenon J. Farr
Respondent:
T. G. Werlich
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Farr v. USA
as 3:2017cv00872
Petitioner:
Keenon J Farr
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Murphy et al v. Madigan et al
as 1:2016cv11471
Plaintiff:
Paul Murphy , Stanley Meyer , J.D. Lindenmeier and others
Defendant:
Lisa Madigan and John Baldwin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plumbers & Pipefitters Welfare Fund Board of Trustees of the et al v. Matrix Plumbing and Heating Inc et al
as 2:2009cv00414
Plaintiff:
Local No 172 Plumbers & Pipefitters Welfare Fund Board of Trustees of the, Local No 172 Plumbers & Pipefitters Welfare Fund Board of Trustees of the, Local No 172 Plumbers & Pipefitters Welfare Fund Board of Trustees of the and others
Defendant:
Matrix Plumbing and Heating Inc, MKH Mechanical Inc, Joseph Laskowski and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
