Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Morris v. Revlon Consumer Products Corporation, et al
as 1:2023cv13275
Plaintiff:
Carolyn M Morris
Defendant:
Revlon Consumer Products Corporation;, Revlon Group Holdings, LLC., Revlon, Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Morris v. Trueblood et al
as 3:2022cv00766
Plaintiff:
Thomas M Morris, III
Defendant:
Trueblood, Scott Demartiss, Shanan Hyduck and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
TESKY v. PUTNAMVILLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 2:2022cv00375
Plaintiff:
JASON ALAN TESKY
Defendant:
PUTNAMVILLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, DUNN, M MORRIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tesky v. Putnamville Correctional Facility et al
as 3:2022cv00699
Plaintiff:
Jason Alan Tesky
Defendant:
Putnamville Correctional Facility, Dunn, M Morris and others
Not Classified By Court:
PUTNAMVILLE E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. Sicily Morris
as 22-1819
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
SICILY M. MORRIS, also known as SICILY MONE MORRIS
Morris et al v. Morris
as 2:2022cv02052
Plaintiff:
James M Morris and Abbie Ellen Morris
Defendant:
Mary Frances Morris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition to Quiet Title
Morris v. Kijakazi
as 1:2022cv00957
Plaintiff:
Erica M. Morris
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
United States of America v. Morris
as 4:2022cv04020
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Michelle M. Morris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Foreclosure
MORRIS v. USA
as 4:2020cv00184
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
SICILY M. MORRIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Morris v. Heuerman et al
as 2:2020cv02114
Defendant:
Shane Cook, Dustin Heuerman, Karee Voges and others
Plaintiff:
Jabari M Morris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
