Cases 1 - 10 of 106
Shareef Childs v. Cheryl Webster, et al
as 24-1817
Plaintiff:
SHAREEF CHILDS
Defendant:
CHERYL WEBSTER, CRAIG LINDGREN and STEVE MOHR
Anderson v. Ludwig et al
as 2:2024cv00189
Plaintiff:
Oscar Raymond Anderson, Jr
Defendant:
Julie Ludwig and Wendy Mohr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kovacic v. Wisconsin Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2024cv00159
Plaintiff:
William T Kovacic
Defendant:
Wisconsin Department of Corrections, Cassandra Abney, Bethany Ross and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. Department of Mohr et al
as 2:2023cv01692
Plaintiff:
Jesse J Anderson
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, Barry Daughtry, Wendy Mohr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mohr v. Enterprise Holdings, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv01874
Plaintiff:
Gary Mohr
Defendant:
Enterprise Holdings, Inc., a Missouri corporation, Enterprise Rent-a-Car Company - Midwest, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, Enterprise Holdings, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00181
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Mohr v. AW Chesterton Company et al
as 1:2022cv06081
Plaintiff:
Raymond Mohr
Defendant:
AW Chesterton Company, Air & Liquid Systems, Inc., Successor by Merger to Buffalo Pumps, Inc., Crown, Cork & Seal USA, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Asbestos Litigation
Smith, Walter v. Pugh, Jeffrey et al
as 3:2022cv00542
Plaintiff:
Walter Smith
Defendant:
Jeffrey Pugh, Cindy O'Donnell, Reed Richardson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kyles, Lorenzo v. Mohr, Steve
as 3:2022cv00479
Plaintiff:
Lorenzo Demond Kyles
Defendant:
Chaplain Steve Mohr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
