Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Erika Mabes, et al v. Angela McFeeley, et al
as 24-1082
Plaintiff:
ERIKA MABES, individually and on behalf of L.M., J.R.M., and J.A.M., minor children and BRIAN MABES, individually and on behalf of L.M., J.R.M., and J.A.M., minor children
Defendant:
ANGELA MCFEELEY, NATASHA DAVIS, COURTNEY OAKES and others
Erika Mabes, et al v. Shannon Thompson
as 24-1048
Plaintiff:
ERIKA MABES, individually and on behalf of L.M., J.R.M., and J.A.M., minor children and BRIAN MABES, individually and on behalf of L.M., J.R.M., and J.A.M., minor children
Defendant:
SHANNON THOMPSON, Doctor
MABES et al v. MCFEELEY et al
as 1:2021cv02062
Plaintiff:
ERIKA MABES and BRIAN MABES
Defendant:
ANGELA MCFEELEY, NATASHA DAVIS, COURTNEY OAKES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MABE v. LAMMER
as 2:2020cv00605
Respondent:
B. LAMMER
Petitioner:
ANTHONY JOSEPH MABE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
TINOCO v. KNORR et al
as 1:2020cv02064
Defendant:
MABE TRUCKING CO, INC., GREGORY KNORR and MABE TRUCKING CO., INC.
Plaintiff:
DAMASO TINOCO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Armantrout et al v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company et al
as 1:2013cv04803
Plaintiff:
Gary Armantrout , Nancy K. Armantrout , Brenda A. Baker and others
Defendant:
Bristol-Myers Squibb Company , Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC , Sanofi-Aventis U.S. Inc. and others
Petitioner:
Clarence A. Blevins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
Kimberly-Clark Worldwide Inc v. Valor Brands LLC et al
as 1:2012cv00298
Plaintiff:
Kimberly-Clark Worldwide Inc
Defendant:
Valor Brands LLC and Grupo PI Mabe SA de CV
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145
Transportation Solutions Group, LLC v. Mabe Trucking Co.
as 1:2009cv00596
Plaintiff:
Transportation Solutions Group, LLC, Transportation Solutions Group, LLC and Transportation Solutions Group, LLC
Defendant:
Mabe Trucking Co., Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
