Cases 1 - 10 of 38
Abre Jackson v. Marc Anastacio, et al
as 23-1737
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ABRE JACKSON
Defendant / Appellee:
MARC ANASTACIO, LAITH ELHAJ, SHADI J. AWAD and others
Abre Jackson v. Marc Anastacio, et al
as 23-1703
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ABRE JACKSON
Defendant / Appellee:
MARC ANASTACIO, LAITH ELHAJ, SHADI J. AWAD and others
Madrigal v. Menard, Inc.
as 1:2022cv05153
Plaintiff:
Patricia Madrigal
Defendant:
Menard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
USA v. Rodolfo Madrigal
as 22-2140
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
RODOLFO MADRIGAL
ABC Corp et al v. Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, The
as 1:2022cv03078
Plaintiff:
ABC Corp and Tetris Holding, LLC
Defendant:
Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, The, star-at_at-star store, 100% cotton T-shirt 39 Store and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44 Trademark Infringement
Madrigal v. MENARD, INC.,
as 1:2022cv00091
Plaintiff:
Maria Madrigal
Defendant:
MENARD, INC.,
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Chmielowicz v. Miller et al
as 1:2021cv05432
Plaintiff:
Scott Chmielowicz
Defendant:
Horace F Miller, Officer Gerardo Madrigal, City of Chicago, a municipal corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Parker v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2021cv01226
Plaintiff:
Rayvon Parker
Defendant:
Ivan Madrigal, Ismael Alvarado, City of Chicago and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pryor et al v. Rush-Copley Medical Center, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv08496
Plaintiff:
Adriana Madrigal, Nathaniel Pryor, Jr., Nathaniel Pryor and others
Defendant:
Rush-Copley Medical Center, Inc., M.D. HINNA KHAN and Hinna Khan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Medical Malpractice
Madrigal v. Saul
as 2:2019cv01349
Plaintiff:
Irene Madrigal
Defendant:
Andrew M Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
