Cases 1 - 10 of 89
HARTING v. MADISON COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2024cv00237
Plaintiff:
DEBORAH HARTING
Defendant:
MADISON COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT, TYLER JUGG, JONATHAN GRIMES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Newsome v. AFAM Concept Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv14595
Plaintiff:
Charla Newsome
Defendant:
AFAM Concept Inc., Avlon Industries Inc, Beauty Bell Enterprises LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Newsome v. Revlon Inc et al
as 1:2023cv08647
Plaintiff:
Annie Newsome
Defendant:
Revlon Inc, Revlon Consumer Products Corporation, and Revlon Group Holdings LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hecke v. Beck et al
as 1:2023cv00286
Plaintiff:
Steven John Hecke
Defendant:
Richard Beck, David Gladieux, David Butler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Newsom v. Attorney General of Indiana
as 3:2023cv00334
Plaintiff:
Thomas J Newsom
Defendant:
Attorney General of Indiana
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Norman v. Newsome et al
as 1:2023cv01938
Plaintiff:
Gary Norman
Defendant:
G. Newsome
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Falbe v. Municipal et al
as 3:2023cv00003
Plaintiff:
Robert Reed Falbe, III
Defendant:
Municipal, Newsom, Kim and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Haywood v. Dart et al
as 1:2022cv05651
Plaintiff:
Donald Haywood
Defendant:
Thomas J. Dart, Cintron, Beecham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
NEWSOM v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2022cv01910
Plaintiff:
RYAN M. NEWSOM
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Newsome v. The Prudential Insurance Company of America
as 2:2022cv00545
Plaintiff:
Lisa N Newsome
Defendant:
The Prudential Insurance Company of America and DaVita Inc Long Term Disability Insurance Plan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
