Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Fletcher v. Peters et al
as 3:2023cv01054
Plaintiff:
Anthony L Fletcher
Defendant:
Sheriff Jarrod Peters, Officer Ryan Coffee, Officer Jason Juenger and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
REDMOND v. ROGERS
as 1:2017cv00180
Plaintiff:
JOHN H. REDMOND, IV
Defendant:
CORRECTIONAL OFFICER ROGERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
REDMOND v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION et al
as 1:2017cv00109
Defendant:
CLOE, T. AARON COX, CASSANDRA FEASTER and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN H. REDMOND, IV
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miller v. White et al
as 1:2016cv02446
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Dale Miller
Defendant:
Officer White, Officer Rogers, Officer Dolan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pointe v. Rogers et. al.
as 1:2013cv04843
Plaintiff:
James Pointe
Defendant:
Officer Rogers, Officer Beckman, Officer Gallagher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BOOKER v. LOCKETT et al
as 2:2012cv00213
Defendant:
OFFICER BALLARD, JULIE BEIGHLEY, OFFICER BOOKER and others
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH BOOKER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
MOON v. LOCKETT et al
as 1:2012cv00771
Defendant:
OFFICER BASINGER, J. BEIGHLEY, OFFICER BETTS and others
Plaintiff:
DARNELL WESLEY MOON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
HERNANDEZ-CADENA v. BRACE et al
as 2:2011cv00191
Defendant:
S. BOYLAN, LT. S. BRACE, J. EDWARDS and others
Plaintiff:
GABRIEL HERNANDEZ-CADENA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2011cv03451
Plaintiff:
Dimetrice L Taylor
Defendant:
City of Chicago and Officer Rogers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Austin v. Vargas et al
as 1:2010cv07355
Plaintiff:
Andrew Austin
Defendant:
Officer Vargas, Officer Wasek, Officer Studer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
