Cases 1 - 10 of 35
Rojas v. Debt Relief Advocates, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv04776
Defendant:
Cordoba Legal Group PLLC, Law Office of Peter M. Daigle, P.C., The, Debt Relief Advocates, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Jorge Alejandro Rojas
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Marleis Trover v. Craig Oglesby, et al
as 24-1733
Plaintiff:
MARLEIS TROVER, as Personal Representative of the Estate of DONALD D. GADDIS
Defendant:
CRAIG OGLESBY and DUSTIN KELLEY
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv16347
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Oglesby v. LOreal USA Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv14884
Plaintiff:
Teresa Oglesby
Defendant:
LOreal USA Inc., LOreal USA Products Inc. and SoftSheen-Carson, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Oglesby et al v. Syngenta Crop Protection LLC et al
as 3:2022pq00998
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Plaintiff:
Ronald Sherman Oglesby and Louvette Oglesby
Defendant:
Syngenta Crop Protection LLC, Syngenta AG and Chevron U.S.A. Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Cavaness v. Oglesby et al
as 3:2021cv01397
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Cavaness
Defendant:
David Oglesby and Central Transport, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Brand v. Oglesby et al
as 3:2021cv01072
Plaintiff:
Crosetti Brand
Defendant:
Oglesby, Daniel Monti and Rob Jeffreys
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BARNES v. WEDDING et al
as 3:2021cv00107
Plaintiff:
RICHARD BARNES
Defendant:
DAVE WEDDING, OGLESBY, JANE DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gaddis v. DeMattei
as 3:2021cv00179
Defendant:
Bryan DeMattei, Tom Stearns, Betty Caraway and others
Plaintiff:
Donald Gaddis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Johnson v. State of Illinois et al
as 3:2020cv03228
Defendant:
Oglesby, Orquiz Rios, City of Springfield and others
Plaintiff:
Samuel Lajuane Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
