Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Barton v. Village of Midlothian et al
as 1:2023cv01692
Plaintiff:
Ms Bernice Barton
Defendant:
Village of Midlothian and Edmund Olmos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Enriquez et al v. Iatrides et al
as 1:2022cv03144
Plaintiff:
Olga Enriquez, MAria Szelai, Elvira Olmos and others
Defendant:
Peter Iatrides, Good Taste, Inc and Cozy Corner Diner & Pancake House, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Rico et al v. Cazares et al
as 1:2018cv07765
Plaintiff:
Guadalupe Rico, Guadalupe Pettinga and John Rico
Defendant:
Laura Cazares, Unknown Owners and Laura Olmos Cazares
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sorensen v. Olmos et al
as 1:2017cv05147
Plaintiff:
Steven Sorensen
Defendant:
Sgt. Olmos and Midlothian Police
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
SIGALA-OLMOS v. USA
as 1:2014cv00940
Petitioner:
TEODORO SIGALA-OLMOS
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Frazier v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2012cv08463
Plaintiff:
Edmund Frazier
Defendant:
City of Chicago, Edgar Del Olmo and Arturo Fernandez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CHANEY v. OLMOS
as 1:2010cv01098
Plaintiff:
DEWAYNE CHANEY
Defendant:
OFFICER FRANCISCO OLMOS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vivanco et al v. Del Olmo et al
as 1:2010cv03136
Plaintiff:
Carmen Vivanco and Elvia Medrano
Defendant:
Richard Del Olmo, Davric Plastic, LLC and Davric Corporation, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Hawkins v. The City of Chicago et al
as 1:2007cv06198
Plaintiff:
Ricky Hawkins and Ricky Hawkins
Defendant:
The City of Chicago, J Perez, M. Webb and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kolas et al v. Rodriguez et al
as 1:2007cv03480
Plaintiff:
So Yur Kolas and Westbank
Defendant:
Ricardo Rodriguez, Carolyn Rodriguez, Michael Denham and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
