Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Thomas Bell v. Marion Superior Court Criminal, et al
as 21-2260
Plaintiff / Appellant:
THOMAS P. BELL
Defendant / Appellee:
MARION SUPERIOR COURT CRIMINAL DIVISION, NO. 1, RYAN MEARS, Prosecutor, MARION COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE and others
Thomas Bell, et al v. All of Indiana Housing & Apts.
as 21-2261
Plaintiff / Appellant:
THOMAS P. BELL and BELL, THOMAS LLC
Defendant / Appellee:
ALL OF INDIANA HOUSING & APTS.
Bell, Thomas LLC, et al v. State Lottery Commission of In
as 21-2205
Plaintiff / Appellant:
THOMAS P. BELL and BELL, THOMAS LLC
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE LOTTERY COMMISSION OF INDIANA, doing business as THE HOOSIER LOTTERY
Bell, Thomas LLC, et al v. Indiana Sheriff's Office, et al
as 21-2160
Plaintiff / Appellant:
THOMAS P. BELL and BELL, THOMAS LLC
Defendant / Appellee:
INDIANA SHERIFF'S OFFICE and INTAKE CLASSIFICATION SHERIFF
Thomas Bell v. Indianapolis Indiana Police
as 21-1994
Plaintiff / Appellant:
THOMAS P. BELL
Defendant / Appellee:
INDIANAPOLIS POLICE DEPARTMENT
Thomas P. Bell v. USA, et al
as 21-1807
Defendant / Appellee:
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES, CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
THOMAS P. BELL
BELL et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2021cv00779
Defendant:
PRESIDENT, JOE BIDEN, CIA and others
Plaintiff:
THOMAS P. BELL and BELL, THOMAS LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv
Niese et al v. ABN AMRO Clearing Chicago LLC. et al
as 1:2011cv05155
Plaintiff:
William A. Niese , James R. Simpson , Thomas W. Johnson, Jr. and others
Defendant:
ABN AMRO Clearing Chicago LLC., Associated Bank, N.A., Amalgamated Bank Of Chicago and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Schuenke v. City Of Milwaukee et al
as 3:2008cv00680
Plaintiff:
Lloyd T. Schuenke
Defendant:
City Of Milwaukee, Craig Sarnow, Mark P. Bell and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
