Cases 1 - 10 of 1,169
Perez v Consumer Financial Services Corporation
as 1:2024cv03180
Plaintiff:
Consumer Financial Services Corporation and Eva Perez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Eason v. Raoul et al
as 3:2024cv50220
Plaintiff:
Hannibal Eason
Defendant:
Kwame Raoul, The Illinois Attorney Generals Office, The Inspector General of Illinois and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03077
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Perez v. Intellicheck, Inc.
as 1:2024cv02381
Plaintiff:
Octavio Perez
Defendant:
Intellicheck, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Jaile v. City of El Paso et al
as 1:2024cv02339
Plaintiff:
Carlos Jaile
Defendant:
City of El Paso, Lilia Beard, Paul Blott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SCUTERI v. ARAMARK CORRECTIONAL SERVICES, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00170
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ANDREW SCUTERI
Defendant:
ARAMARK CORRECTIONAL SERVICES, LLC, CARGILL MANUFACTURING, INCORPORATED, GOOD SOURCE SOLUTIONS and others
Interested Party:
GLENN ANDREW SCUTERI, TIFFANY ROSE SCUTERI and TRICIA PRETORIUS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jesse Perez v. Mohammed Siddiqui
as 24-1766
Plaintiff:
JESSE R. PEREZ
Defendant:
MOHAMMED SIDDIQUI, Medical Director, Wexford
PEREZ v. REAGLE
as 1:2024cv00755
Petitioner:
OSCAR PEREZ
Respondent:
CHRISTINA REAGLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Perez v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv03530
Plaintiff:
Maria C. Perez
Defendant:
Commissioner Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv50101
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
