Cases 1 - 10 of 2,705
Phillips v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00771
Plaintiff:
Christopher M Phillips
Defendant:
Martin J O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02142
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
PHILLIPS v. LEFFLER et al
as 2:2024cv00313
Plaintiff:
JAMES E. PHILLIPS
Defendant:
LEFFLER, K. PADGETT, CRANE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Below v. Heidi Brown, et al
as 24-1995
Plaintiff:
GREGORY T. BELOW
Defendant:
HEIDI BROWN, C.O. (Proknower), DARYL FLANNERY, PHILLIP FRIEDRICH, C.O. and others
Sitter v. Sage Specialty Pharmacy Inc et al
as 2:2024cv00710
Plaintiff:
Gregory Sitter
Defendant:
Sage Specialty Pharmacy, Inc and Jon Phillips
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act
Anthony-El v. Circuit Court of the twentieth Judicial Circuit et al
as 3:2024cv01448
Petitioner:
Javier Anthony-El
Respondent:
Circuit Court of the twentieth Judicial Circuit, State of Illinois and Jesse Phillips
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
PHILLIPS v. ERNEST et al
as 2:2024cv00233
Plaintiff:
JAMES E. PHILLIPS
Defendant:
ERNEST, JACKSON, WILLIAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PHILLIPS v. MJEAN et al
as 2:2024cv00234
Plaintiff:
JAMES E. PHILLIPS
Defendant:
MJEAN, NEFF and HEOLTERBRAND
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PHILLIPS v. ELLIS et al
as 2:2024cv00235
Plaintiff:
JAMES E. PHILLIPS
Defendant:
MIKE ELLIS, JESSE and C. POPE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stonehart et al v. Now Health Group, Inc.
as 1:2024cv04436
Plaintiff:
Phillip Stonehart and Moussa Kouyate
Defendant:
Now Health Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
