Cases 1 - 10 of 61
Leisten v. R&R Pizza Group, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv05068
Plaintiff:
Colby Leisten
Defendant:
R&R Pizza Group, LLC and Jair Reyes
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Su v. 2103 Restaurant Group, LLC et al
as 3:2024cv01481
Plaintiff:
Julie A. Su
Defendant:
2103 Restaurant Group, LLC d/b/a IHOP, Khalid Ramadan and R&R Restaurant Group, Inc. d/b/a IHOP
Mide v. R. R. Donnelley & Sons Company
as 1:2023cv16493
Plaintiff:
Charles Mide
Defendant:
R. R. Donnelley & Sons Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01369
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Casteel v. Lucht et al
as 2:2023cv00473
Plaintiff:
John Albert Casteel and Tayr Kilaab al Ghashiyah
Defendant:
Adam Lucht, Jackie Jones, Kevin Carr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02073
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Excel Modular Scaffold and Leasing Corporation v. R&R General Construction Incorporated et al
as 1:2022cv02402
Plaintiff:
Excel Modular Scaffold and Leasing Corporation
Defendant:
R&R General Construction Incorporated and Archer Daniels Midland Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Durairajan v. Rose et al
as 3:2021cv50443
Plaintiff:
Lavanya Durairajan
Defendant:
James Rose and R&R Trucking
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Durairajan v. Rose et al
as 1:2021cv06150
Plaintiff:
Lavanya Durairajan
Defendant:
James Rose and R&R Trucking
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
R & R MEDICAL LLC v. RHODES et al
as 1:2021cv02634
Plaintiff:
R & R MEDICAL LLC d/b/a BEAR KOMPLEX
Defendant:
JACOB RHODES and ROUTINE INC.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
