Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Katcher v. Gonzalez et al
as 1:2022cv03459
Plaintiff:
Joanne Katcher
Defendant:
Richard A Gonzalez, Michael E. Severino, Robert A. Michael and others
Treppel Family Trust, Derivatively on Behalf of Abbvie Inc. v. Gonzalez et al
as 1:2022cv02718
Plaintiff:
Treppel Family Trust, Derivatively on Behalf of Abbvie Inc.
Defendant:
Richard A. Gonzalez, Michael E. Severino, Robert A. Michael and others
Nakata v. AbbVie Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv01773
Plaintiff:
Calvin T. Nakata
Defendant:
AbbVie Inc., Richard A. Gonzalez, Robert A. Michaels and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation
STEWART v. BERRYHILL
as 1:2018cv00012
Defendant:
NANCY A. BERRYHILL
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only) and SSA-USAO (Court Use Only)
Plaintiff:
LARRY R. STEWART
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
STEWART v. MALONE
as 1:2017cv02696
Defendant:
JOSEPH W. MALONE
Plaintiff:
JOHN R. STEWART
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Edwards v. Norfolk Southern Railway et al
as 1:2017cv03608
Plaintiff:
Joyce Edwards
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway, James A Squires, Marta R Stewart and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
STEWART v. COLVIN
as 2:2015cv00022
Defendant:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND R. STEWART
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv00159
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Viveros, Gustavo v. VPP Group, LLC et al
as 3:2012cv00129
Plaintiff:
Gustavo Utrera Viveros and Christian Kling
Defendant:
VPP Group, LLC, Frederick R. Stewart, ABC Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv07901
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
