Cases 1 - 10 of 12
James Todd v. Kess Roberson
as 14-3430
Petitioner - Appellant:
JAMES R. TODD
Respondent - Appellee:
KESS ROBERSON, Warden
JENKINS v. TODD
as 4:2014cv00085
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY DALE JENKINS
Defendant:
TED R. TODD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
JENKINS v. TODD
as 4:2014cv00069
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY DALE JENKINS
Defendant:
TED R. TODD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Todd v. Roberson
as 3:2014cv50072
Petitioner:
James R. Todd
Respondent:
Kess Roberson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
HALE v. JEFFERSON COUNTY COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS PROGRAM et al
as 4:2013cv00003
Defendant:
JOHN DOE, AMBER FINNEGAN, ALISON T. FRAZIER and others
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY HALE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
FEUTZ v. JEFFERSON COUNTY COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS PROGRAM et al
as 4:2013cv00002
Defendant:
JOHN DOE, AMBER FINNEGAN, ALISON T. FRAZIER and others
Plaintiff:
SHAWN E. FEUTZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WESTERN RESERVE MUTUAL CASUALTY COMPANY v. TODD et al
as 2:2012cv00302
Defendant:
BONNIE CORDELL, ROGER CORDELL and DANIEL R. TODD
Plaintiff:
WESTERN RESERVE MUTUAL CASUALTY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgement
THACKER et al v. ANBRO ELECTRIC COMPANY INC.
as 1:2012cv01168
Defendant:
ANBRO ELECTRIC COMPANY INC.
Plaintiff:
INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS LOCAL 725 SUPPLEMENTAL PENSION FUND and R. TODD THACKER
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Chicagoland Aviation, LLC v. Todd et al
as 1:2012cv01139
Plaintiff:
Chicagoland Aviation, LLC
Defendant:
Richard R. Todd and Chicago Premier Boat Rental, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Todd v. Wade et al
as 3:2010cv50309
Plaintiff:
James R. Todd
Defendant:
Doug Wade, Buhler, James Heuerman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
