Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Lea-Max Corporation v. Raytheon Technologies Corporation et al
as 1:2023cv00164
Plaintiff:
LEA-MAX CORPORATION
Defendant:
Raytheon Technologies Corporation, The Pullman Company and Gould Electronics, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9607 Real Property Tort to Land
Downs v. Raytheon Technologies Corporation
as 1:2022cv00009
Plaintiff:
Mr. Michael Downs and Michael Downs
Defendant:
Raytheon Technologies Corporation and Raytheon Company
Not Classified By Court:
Anthony Stites
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 510 E.R.I.S.A.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00266
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Asher et al v. Raytheon Technologies Corporation et al
as 1:2020cv00238
Plaintiff:
Cory Feltner, Anna Standafer, Alex Powell and others
Defendant:
Andrews Dairy Store Inc, Lear Corporation Eeds and Interiors, LLC, CP Product LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv01785
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
JACKSON v. 4M BUILDING SOLUTIONS, INC. et al
as 1:2016cv00603
Defendant:
4M BUILDING SOLUTIONS, INC. and RAYTHEON TECHNICAL SERVICES COMPANY, LLC
Plaintiff:
LARRY JACKSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00031
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00211
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00526
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00241
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
