Cases 1 - 10 of 1,456
Hatter v. DART et al
as 1:2024cv04735
Plaintiff:
Daneka Hatter
Defendant:
THOMAS DART, Supt. Cintron, Sgt. Skinner and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Oldenberg et al v. Syngenta AG et al
as 3:2024pq01460
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Plaintiff:
Raymond Oldenberg and Dawn Oldenberg
Defendant:
Syngenta AG, Syngenta Crop Protection LLC and Does 1 through 60 inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Fuller v Kirk et al
as 1:2024cv00706
Plaintiff:
David Wesley Fuller
Defendant:
Judge Philip Kirk, Judge Raymond S Huber, Mary Calder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Charles v. The Chicago Police Department
as 1:2024cv04593
Plaintiff:
Shaun Raymond Charles and Shawn Raymond Charles
Defendant:
The Chicago Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Strohl et al v. Syngenta Crop Protection LLC et al
as 3:2024pq01424
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Plaintiff:
Raymond Strohl and Diane Strohl
Defendant:
Syngenta Crop Protection LLC, Syngenta AG and Chevron U.S.A., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
J.B.H. v. Knox County et al
as 4:2024cv04096
Plaintiff:
J. B. H.
Defendant:
Knox County, Raymond A. Cavanaugh, Bridget E. Pletz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Terry v. White et al
as 1:2024cv04003
Plaintiff:
Dimari Terry
Defendant:
Raymond White, Reinaldo Sanchez, Jerrell Danner-Lardino and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Crawford v. Smith
as 1:2024cv03447
Plaintiff:
Kristyn Crawford
Defendant:
Raymond Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
SAMS v. PRETORIOUS
as 2:2024cv00160
Petitioner:
RAYMOND D. SAMS
Respondent:
TRICIA PRETORIOUS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
