Cases 1 - 10 of 42
Reid v. Renfro et al
as 2:2024cv02019
Plaintiff:
Warnell Reid
Defendant:
. Renfro, . Zieglar, . Clendenen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ademeko Maclin-Carney v. Ashley Warner, et al
as 24-1110
Plaintiff:
ADEMEKO MACLIN-CARNEY
Defendant:
ASHLEY WARNER, MICHELLE STINE, WENDY DIERECKS and others
Hughes v. Maloney et al
as 2:2023cv02243
Plaintiff:
Lerin Hughes
Defendant:
. Maloney, . Renfro, . Geotz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hughes v. Root et al
as 2:2023cv02236
Plaintiff:
Lerin Hughes
Defendant:
Jim Root, . Belcher, R.N. . Farmer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Maclin-Carney v. Maloney et al
as 2:2023cv02229
Plaintiff:
Ademeko Maclin-Carney
Defendant:
Corey Maloney, . Renfro, Macon County Sheriff's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Renfro v. Revlon Consumer Products Corporation et al
as 1:2023cv11912
Plaintiff:
Danielle Renfro
Defendant:
Revlon Consumer Products Corporation, Revlon Group Holdings LLC, Revlon, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Novoselsky v. Larkin et al
as 1:2023cv00484
Plaintiff:
David Alan Novoselsky
Defendant:
Jerome Larkin, Scott Renfroe and Benjamin Borougf
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Renfro v. Rotary International
as 1:2022cv06132
Plaintiff:
Kemberly Renfro
Defendant:
Rotary International
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
OWENS et al v. CARTER et al
as 1:2022cv01613
Plaintiff:
DAVID OWENS, DAVID HOWARD, MICHAEL WILSON and others
Defendant:
ERIC J. HOLCOMB, ROBERT E. CARTER, JR., DAUSS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02973
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
