Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Roller Ready LLC v. LA Systems LLC et al
as 1:2023cv00068
Plaintiff:
Roller Ready LLC
Defendant:
LA Systems LLC d/b/a Monkey Rung, Paul Kiley and LA Systems, LLC doing business as Monkey Rung
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Otis v. Dpt. Health Services et al
as 3:2022cv50301
Plaintiff:
Jill Otis
Defendant:
Dpt. Health Services, Ana Rodriguez, Stacia Runge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
PROBST v. ELI LILLY AND COMPANY et al
as 1:2022cv01106
Plaintiff:
JENNIFER M. PROBST
Defendant:
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY, BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF ELI LILLY AND COMPANY, DAVID A. RICKS and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01097
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Runge v. Wilkie et al
as 1:2020cv06125
Defendant:
Robert L. Wilkie, Jr. and U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs
Plaintiff:
James Runge
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 791
Hogan v. DeCecco et al
as 2:2019cv00497
Defendant:
Wick Larkin, Matthew Jurss, Sgt Fenn and others
Plaintiff:
Markell L Hogan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kellogg v. Gerald L. Runge Trust et al
as 1:2017cv04609
Plaintiff:
Daniel Kellogg
Defendant:
Gerald L. Runge Trust and Kane County, Illinois
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv03407
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Mullings v. Anderson et al
as 1:2016cv08057
Plaintiff:
Jared I Mullings
Defendant:
Gordon H Anderson, USF Holland, Inc. , Ricky L Ashleson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Goings v. Baldwin et al
as 3:2016cv00489
Plaintiff:
Fredrick Goings
Defendant:
John Baldwin, Donald Stolworthy, Kim Butler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
