Cases 1 - 10 of 12
White v. Melman et al
as 2:2019cv00541
Defendant:
James Stockwell, S DeYoung, W Strelow and others
Plaintiff:
Jermaine White
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Strelow, Marcel v. Comey, James et al
as 3:2019cv00143
Plaintiff:
Marcel Lynn Strelow
Defendant:
Andrew McCabe and James Comey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Alexander, Ricky v. Rasmussen, R. et al
as 3:2018cv01063
Plaintiff:
Ricky N. Alexander
Defendant:
Lieutenant R. Rasmussen and Lieutenant D. Strelow
Undetermined:
WSPF Prison Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
London v. Walker et al
as 2:2018cv01655
Defendant:
Jennifer Koehler, Wisconsin Department of Corrections, Schulz and others
Plaintiff:
Keith London
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
London v. State of Wisconsin et al
as 2:2018cv01028
Defendant:
Jennifer Koehler, Wisconsin Department of Corrections, Sara Schneider and others
Plaintiff:
Keith London
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
London v. State of Wisconsin Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2018cv00889
Plaintiff:
Keith London
Defendant:
State of Wisconsin Department of Corrections , State of Wisconsin Probation and Parole Commission, Jim Schwochert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ricky Alexander v. Richard Rasmussen, et al
as 17-3056
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICKY N. ALEXANDER
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES R. SCHWOCHERT, DAVID STRELOW and RICHARD A. RASMUSSEN
Ricky Alexander v. Richard Rasmussen, et al
as 17-2891
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICKY N. ALEXANDER
Defendant - Appellee:
RICHARD A. RASMUSSEN, DAVID STRELOW and JAMES SCHWOCHERT
Charles Beal, Jr. v. James Beller, et al
as 14-2628
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES W. BEAL, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES BELLER, Officer and MATT STRELOW, Officer
London v. Kaplin et al
as 2:2014cv00125
Plaintiff:
Keith London
Defendant:
Roman Kaplin , T Williams, Dr Lee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
