Cases 1 - 10 of 89
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1658
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Farner v. Redmond et al
as 3:2024cv50058
Plaintiff:
Joshua S Farner
Defendant:
Robert Redmond, Justin Egler, Major Fernandez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson, Jr. et al v. Murray et al
as 3:2023cv00902
Plaintiff:
Kinte J. Johnson, Jr. and Tristan T. Johnson
Defendant:
Dave Murray, Indiana State Police Officer and J Eagen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. Revlon Consumer Products Corporation; et al
as 1:2023cv11304
Plaintiff:
Christal T Johnson
Defendant:
Revlon Consumer Products Corporation;, Revlon Group Holdings, LLC, REVLON, INC., and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Johnson v. Naugle et al
as 3:2023cv02988
Plaintiff:
Michael T Johnson
Defendant:
R. Naugle, Jennifer Cowan and Anthony D. Wills
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01418
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Wills et al
as 3:2023cv02707
Plaintiff:
Michael T Johnson
Defendant:
Anthony D. Wills, Curtis L Dallas, Yvette Baker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Andre Echols, Jr. v. Peter Niznik, et al
as 23-2454
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANDRE L. ECHOLS, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
PETER NIZNIK, Officer, Star #9182, EDDIE T. JOHNSON, Former CPD Superintendent, ERIK ALBRIGHT, Officer, Star #11522 and others
Jamaal Charles v. Deanne Brookhart, et al
as 23-1911
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMAAL CHARLES
Defendant / Appellee:
DEANNE BROOKHART, KEVIN T. JOHNSON, DARREN J. WILLIAMS and others
Hancock v. Roach et al
as 2:2023cv02042
Plaintiff:
Romeo L Earving and Lawrence L Hancock
Defendant:
Nicole Roach, . Davis, Troy Wasson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
