Cases 1 - 10 of 14,513
Streeter et al v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2024cv04158
Plaintiff:
Jovan Streeter and Marquita Beecham
Defendant:
City Of Chicago, Kenneth Sunde, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00177
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
BENSON et al v. CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS et al
as 1:2024cv00839
Plaintiff:
LEON BENSON and KOLLEEN BUNCH
Defendant:
CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS, ALAN F. JONES, LESLIE VANBUSKIRK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
People Of The State Of Illinois et al v. Keeler
as 1:2024cv04083
Plaintiff:
People Of The State Of Illinois and City Of Hickory Hills
Defendant:
Kevin J. Keeler
Mata v. State of Arizona
as 3:2024cv50183
Defendant:
State of Arizona and City of Chandler
Plaintiff:
Christian Mata
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Milakovich v. City of Waukesha et al
as 2:2024cv00608
Plaintiff:
Cher Milakovich
Defendant:
City of Waukesha, Daniel Thompson, John Doe #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BARHAM INVESTMENTS, LLC v. CITY OF CARMEL
as 1:2024cv00819
Plaintiff:
BARHAM INVESTMENTS, LLC
Defendant:
INDIANA CITY OF CARMEL
Cause Of Action: 43 U.S.C. § 945 Compensation for Land Condemnation
Boothe v. City of Northfield, Illinois
as 1:2024cv04011
Plaintiff:
Scott Boothe
Defendant:
City of Northfield, Illinois
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03941
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Bynum v. City of Bridgton Police Dept.
as 1:2024cv04029
Plaintiff:
Darryl R Bynum, Jr
Defendant:
City of Bridgton Police Dept.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
