Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Bowman et al v Ingersoll-Rand Industrial U.S. Inc
as 3:2024cv00285
Plaintiff:
DALLAS BOWMAN, THOMAS DAVIES, FRED FURLANO, SR. and others
Defendant:
INGERSOLL-RAND INDUSTRIAL U.S., INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Davis v. AFNI Inc
as 1:2022cv01294
Plaintiff:
Thomas Davis
Defendant:
AFNI Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Default
Prochnow v. Afni, Inc.
as 1:2022cv01287
Plaintiff:
Nicole Prochnow
Defendant:
Afni, Inc.
Not Classified By Court:
Marian Caldwell Powell, Leslie Green, Thomas Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
Charles v. Davy et al
as 1:2021cv01783
Defendant:
Thomas Davy
Plaintiff:
Jamaal Charles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DAVIS v. US PRESIDENTIAL TASK FORCE
as 1:2018cv01267
Plaintiff:
GENE THOMAS DAVIS
FBI/DEA:
US PRESIDENTIAL TASK FORCE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Terrell Anderson v. Cook County Board, et al
as 17-2188
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TERRELL ANDERSON
Defendant - Appellee:
COOK COUNTY BOARD, TONI PRECKWINKLE, THOMAS DAVY, Judge and others
Anderson v. Board of Cook County et al
as 1:2016cv01066
Plaintiff:
Terrell Anderson
Defendant:
Board of Cook County, Toni Preckwinkle, Thomas Davy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis et al v. AbbVie et al
as 1:2014cv06920
Plaintiff:
Thomas Davis and Patricia Davis
Defendant:
AbbVie and Abbott Laboratories Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Davis v. Emanuel et al
as 1:2014cv02689
Plaintiff:
Thomas Davis
Defendant:
Rahm Emanuel, Gary McCarthy, Chicago Police Ofc. 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Biomet Inc et al
as 3:2014cv00803
Defendant:
Biomet Inc , Biomet Orthopedics LLC and Biomet US Reconstruction LLC
Plaintiff:
Thomas Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
