Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Treadwell v. Walkerton Police Department
as 3:2024cv00226
Plaintiff:
Tanishia Treadwell
Defendant:
Walkerton Police Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Treadwell et al v. Revlon Consumer Products Corporation et al
as 1:2023cv11724
Plaintiff:
Grace Treadwell and Obie Treadwell
Defendant:
Revlon Consumer Products Corporation, Revlon Group Holdings, LLC and Revlon, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Treadwell v. Saul
as 1:2020cv06293
Plaintiff:
Tanishia Treadwell
Defendant:
Commissioner Andrew M. Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
TREADWELL v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2020cv06228
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Plaintiff:
QIANA TREADWELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Treadwell v. Abbott Laboratories et al
as 1:2019cv04462
Plaintiff:
Cecilia Treadwell
Defendant:
Abbott Laboratories, Takeda Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Astrazeneca LP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Treadwell v. Salgado et al
as 1:2019cv03179
Defendant:
City of Chicago, David Salgado and Xavier Elizondo
Plaintiff:
Mark Treadwell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Treadwell v. Power Solutions International, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv08212
Plaintiff:
Jerome Treadwell
Defendant:
NOVAtime Technology, Inc. and Power Solutions International, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
CIT Bank N.A. v. Genelle Treadwell et al
as 1:2018cv07366
Counter Defendant:
Genelle Treadwell, United States of America c/o HUD, Second City Construction Co., Inc and others
Plaintiff:
CIT Bank N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv04459
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Alfonzo Treadwell v. Scott Eckstein
as 18-2050
Petitioner - Appellant:
ALFONZO C. TREADWELL
Respondent - Appellee:
SCOTT ECKSTEIN
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
