Cases 1 - 8 of 8
AHMED v. U.S. DEPT. OF JUSTICE et al
as 2:2021cv00178
Respondent:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, B. LAMMER and U.S. DEPT. OF JUSTICE
Petitioner:
FAROOQUE AHMED
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Johnson v. U.S. Dept. of Justice et al
as 1:2017cv05941
Plaintiff:
Albert Louis Johnson
Defendant:
U.S. Dept. of Justice , U.S. Parole Commission , Randell Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Wright v. U.S. Dept of Justice et al
as 1:2014cv01542
Petitioner:
Earl Lee Wright
Respondent:
U.S. Dept of Justice, Illinois Dept. of Corret., Michael P. Randle and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Perry v. U.S. Government et al
as 1:2012cv07990
Plaintiff:
Torrin O. Perry
Defendant:
U.S. Government , U.S. Dept. of Justice , State of Il. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Edwards v. U.S. Dept. of Justice et al
as 1:2010cv03883
Plaintiff:
Robert Lee Edwards
Defendant:
U.S. Dept. of Justice and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
RICHMAN, ROBERT D. v. U.S. DEPT. OF JUSTICE
as 3:1990cv00019
Plaintiff:
Robert D. Richman and Susan I. Richman
Defendant:
U.s. Dept. Of Justice
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Eugene Brown, Jr. v. Patrick Fitzgerald, et al
as 08-2778
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EUGENE W. BROWN, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
PATRICK J. FITZGERALD, individually and in his capacity as U.S. Attorney, Northern District of Illinois, THOMAS P. WALSH, individually and in his capacity as Assistant U.S. Attorney, Chief of Civil Division, H. JARRETT MARSHALL, individually and in his capacity as Counsel for the U.S. Dept. of Justice Office of Professional Responsibility and others
TROUTT v. MARYBERRY et al
as 2:2008cv00127
Plaintiff:
ERIC TROUTT
Defendant:
H.J. MARYBERRY, U.S. DEPT OF JUSTICE, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
