Cases 1 - 10 of 12
WOODS v. IMPD
as 1:2022cv01665
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM PLYANDER WOODS
Defendant:
IMPD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WOODS v. STATE OF INDIANA
as 1:2018cv01131
Defendant:
COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS OF MARION COUNTY, DETECTIVES OF MARION COUNTY PROSECUTER and STATE OF INDIANA
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM P. WOODS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WOOD v. MIDWEST WAFFLES, INC. et al
as 1:2016cv03217
Plaintiff:
WOOD and WILLIAM R WOOD
Defendant:
MIDWEST WAFFLES, INC, WAFFLE HOUSE, INC. and MIDWEST WAFFLES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WOODS v. IMPD et al
as 1:2016cv01442
Defendant:
IMPD, MARION COUNTY COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS and MARION COUNTY PROSECUTER
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM P WOODS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
IN RE: FAILURE TO COMPLY
as 1:2014mc00052
Respondent:
JONATHAN ROBERT ANDERSON, MAX WAYNE APPLE, JILL MICHELLE ARNOLD and others
In Re:
FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION REQUIREMENTS, NONPAYMENT OF ATTORNEY REGISTRATION FEES, AND/OR FAILURE TO SUBMIT IOLTA CERTIFICATION
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv07649
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
WOOD v. KNIGHT
as 1:2010cv00910
Respondent:
WENDY KNIGHT
Petitioner:
WILLIAM JOHN WOOD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WOOD v. KNIGHT
as 1:2010cv00775
Respondent:
WENDY KNIGHT
Petitioner:
WILLIAM JOHN WOOD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WOOD v. STATE OF INDIANA
as 1:2009cv01059
Petitioner:
WILLIAM J. WOOD
Respondent:
STATE OF INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brown v. City of Mounds, Illinois et al
as 3:2008cv00861
Plaintiff:
Edward R. Brown
Defendant:
The City of Mounds, Illinois, Mounds City, Illinois, Waymon A. Butler, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
