Cases 1 - 9 of 9
WHITLOCK v. BUSS et al
as 1:2010cv01468
Defendant:
EDWIN G. BUSS, INDIANA PAROLE BOARD MEMBERS, GREGORY D. SERVER; RANDELL P. GENTRY; THOR R. MILLER; VALERIE J. PARKER, AND WILLIAM R. HARRIS and BRUCE C. LEMMON
Plaintiff:
FLOYD E. WHITLOCK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gibbs-El v. Hegewald et al
as 4:2009cv00096
Plaintiff:
Kenneth W Gibbs-El
Defendant:
Art Hegewald, Christopher E Meloy, Randall P Gentry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PARKS v. BUSS et al
as 1:2009cv01174
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY PARKS
Defendant:
EDWIN BUSS, J. DAVID DONAHUE, JIM WYNN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bleeke et al v. Buss et al
as 1:2009cv00228
Plaintiff:
David Bleeke, David Bleeke, Melissa Bleeke and others
Defendant:
Edwin G Buss, Gregory Server, Randall P Gentry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kenneth Gibbs v. Randall Gentry, et al
as 09-2092
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KENNETH W. GIBBS-EL
Defendant - Appellee:
RANDALL P. GENTRY, CHRISTOPHER E. MELOY, THOR R. MILLER and others
Kenneth Gibbs-El v. Randall Gentry, et al
as 09-1511
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KENNETH W. GIBBS-EL
Defendant - Appellee:
RANDALL P. GENTRY, Vice Chairman Indiana Parole Board, CHRISTOPHER E. MELOY, Member Indiana Parole Board, THOR R. MILLER, Member Indiana Parole Board and others
GIBBS v. GENTRY et al
as 4:2009cv00014
Plaintiff:
KENNETH WILLIS GIBBS
Defendant:
RANDALL P. GENTRY, CHRISTOPHER E. MELOY, THOR R. MILLER and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Gibbs-El v. Gentry et al
as 2:2008cv00302
Plaintiff:
Kenneth W Gibbs-El
Defendant:
Randall P Gentry, Christopher E Meloy, Thor R Miller and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Ware v. Rizzo et al
as 3:2007cv00584
Plaintiff:
Keith Ware
Defendant:
Raymond W Rizzo, Randall P Gentry, Thor R Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
