Cases 101 - 110 of 46,372
Levac v. Haney
as 4:2024cv00276
Plaintiff:
Daniel Levac
Defendant:
Sarah Haney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Pointer et al v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
as 4:2024cv00291
Plaintiff:
Marvin L Pointer and Brenda Pointer
Defendant:
State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Watson v. Philhours et al
as 2:2024cv00094
Plaintiff:
Owen Watson
Defendant:
Randy Philhours and Mike Snell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Millsaps v. Jackson et al
as 2:2024cv00062
Plaintiff:
Kane Derrick Millsaps
Defendant:
Moses Jackson and Michael Richardson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00083
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 American Disability Act for Handicapped
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00084
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 American Disability Act for Handicapped
Troka v. McCown et al
as 3:2024cv00082
Plaintiff:
Ethan Troka
Defendant:
Patrick McCown, North Central Unit Chaple, Jeffery Batson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Arkansas Department of Corrections
as 4:2024cv00441
Plaintiff:
Ethan C Hill
Defendant:
Arkansas Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martinez v. Payne
as 4:2024cv00271
Plaintiff:
Jacinto Martinez
Defendant:
Dexter Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Citizens Bank v. Custom Critical Carrier Company et al
as 3:2024cv00048
Plaintiff:
Citizens Bank
Defendant:
Custom Critical Carrier Company and Bogdan Savicevic
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
