Cases 21 - 30 of 1,401
Smith v. USA et al
as 4:2024cv00229
Plaintiff:
Derrick Wade Smith
Defendant:
USA, Pulaski County Regional Detention Facility, Pulaski County Sheriff's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tavron v. Payne et al
as 2:2024cv00044
Plaintiff:
Marques Tavron
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Mose Jackson, III, M Richarson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thrift v. Payne et al
as 2:2024cv00035
Plaintiff:
Sean Alan Thrift
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Moses Jackson, Tyrone Allison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fowler v. Culclager et al
as 3:2024cv00030
Plaintiff:
Chad Anthony Louis Fowler
Defendant:
Aundrea Culclager, Smith and Ashley Wells
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Elmore v. Shipman et al
as 4:2024cv00146
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Elmore
Defendant:
James Shipman, Mariece Culclager, Shelby Huston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cowgill v. Shipman et al
as 4:2024cv00147
Plaintiff:
Jeffery S Cowgill
Defendant:
James Shipman, Mariece Culclager, Shelby Huston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore v. Randle et al
as 4:2024cv00125
Plaintiff:
Terrence Moore
Defendant:
Kenyon Randle, Paul Harris, Etherly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Youngberg v. Weaver et al
as 4:2024cv00120
Plaintiff:
Charles Youngberg
Defendant:
Tim Weaver, Drew Smith, L C Oquin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Odem v. Felts et al
as 4:2024cv00100
Plaintiff:
Jack Odem, III
Defendant:
John Felts, Andy Shock, Lona McCastlain and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Radford v. Smith et al
as 2:2024cv00014
Plaintiff:
Tommy L Radford
Defendant:
Smith and Q Morris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
