Cases 1 - 10 of 56
Alamin El v. USA et al
as 4:2023cv00638
Plaintiff:
Abdul Alamin El and Cortez Thomas
Defendant:
USA and Arkansas, State of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Huck et al v. Dillon Transportation LLC et al
as 4:2022cv00546
Plaintiff:
Christopher Huck and Taneshia Huck
Defendant:
Dillon Transportation LLC and Darrin Cortez Leavell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Hudson v. Marbley et al
as 4:2022cv00364
Plaintiff:
Xavier Cortez Hudson
Defendant:
Tina Marbley, CoreCivic West Tennessee Detention and Marrel Adams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gould v. Payne
as 4:2020cv01084
Defendant:
Dexter Payne
Plaintiff:
Cortez Gould
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Pryor v. Arkansas Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2020cv00658
Defendant:
Arkansas Department of Corrections, Aundrea Culcalger, Wendy Kelley and others
Plaintiff:
Cortez Pryor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tate et al v. Arkansas Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2020cv00558
Plaintiff:
Ceclia Tate
Defendant:
Aundrea Culcalger, Does 1-100, Correctional Officers Unnamed, 1-100, Jane and John Does, Wendy Kelley and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Lorenzo Jiles, Jr, Elijah McAlister, A Biddings and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Horner v. Bowers et al
as 4:2019cv00690
Defendant:
Marty Boyde and Keith Bowers
Plaintiff:
Akeem Edward Cortez Horner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cortez v. USA
as 4:2019cv00515
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Ramiro Cortez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Reed v. Gober et al
as 5:2019cv00135
Defendant:
Doe, Brian Slaughter, Sewzan Pots and others
Plaintiff:
Cortez Reed
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reed v. Wilburn et al
as 5:2019cv00129
Defendant:
Bob Grahm, Ron Nicholes and Percy Wilburn
Plaintiff:
Cortez Reed
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
