Cases 31 - 40 of 390
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv05191
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Morgan v. Helder et al
as 5:2022cv05183
Plaintiff:
Kristopher M. Morgan
Defendant:
Tim Helder, County Judge Woods, Governer Asa Hutchinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Ghormley et al
as 4:2022cv04074
Plaintiff:
Donal Jones
Defendant:
Karen Ghormley, Steve Otwell and Sheriff Danny Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gorman v. Jones
as 5:2022cv05170
Plaintiff:
Tommy Gorman
Defendant:
Steven Anthony Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Gorman v. Jones
as 5:2022cv05168
Plaintiff:
Tommy Gorman
Defendant:
Steven Anthony Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Morgan v. Phaypanya et al
as 5:2022cv05130
Plaintiff:
Kristopher Morgan
Defendant:
Pihara Yosita, Clint Doe, Nick Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Weeks v. Stewart et al
as 6:2022cv06074
Plaintiff:
Paul Michael Weeks
Defendant:
Deputy Stewart, Rashad Nalls, Litzsey G Everett, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. President & CEO of Walmart Inc. et al
as 5:2022cv05116
Plaintiff:
Dwayne Anderson
Defendant:
President & CEO of Walmart Inc., WalMart, Inc., Sally Carroll and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Jones v. Arkansas Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2022cv06063
Plaintiff:
Keithes Montel Jones
Defendant:
Arkansas Department of Corrections, Daniels, Forrest and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wallace v. Henry et al
as 6:2022cv06043
Plaintiff:
Byron Wallace
Defendant:
Dr Guy Henry, Monga, Sgt. Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
