Cases 1 - 10 of 37
Brown v. Kijakazi
as 4:2023cv01294
Plaintiff:
Rashonda Leicole Brown
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Brown v. Kijakazi
as 4:2023cv01228
Plaintiff:
Frances Brown
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Brown v. Kijakazi
as 4:2023cv00212
Plaintiff:
Courtney G. Brown
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Brown v. Saul
as 2:2021cv00043
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Plaintiff:
Debra A. Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Brown v. Saul
as 1:2021cv00066
Plaintiff:
Michael Brown
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Brown v. Saul
as 4:2021cv00001
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Brown
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Brown v. Saul
as 1:2019cv00229
Plaintiff:
Donald Dewayne Brown
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 427
Brown v. Saul
as 4:2019cv01761
Plaintiff:
Sarah L. Brown
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Brown v. Berryhill
as 4:2019cv01564
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Todd Brown
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security and Nancy A. Berryhill
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Brown v. Berryhill
as 2:2019cv00042
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security and Nancy A. Berryhill
Plaintiff:
Brenda L Brown and Brenda L. Brown
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
