Cases 1 - 10 of 122
Jones v. St. Louis County Missouri et al
as 4:2024cv00880
Plaintiff:
Karen Jones
Defendant:
St. Louis County Missouri and Amanda B. McNulley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mencin v. City of Troy Police et al
as 4:2024cv00852
Plaintiff:
Andrew Mencin
Defendant:
City of Troy Police, Ron Sconce, Harold Horner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gerran et al v. City of Ferguson et al
as 4:2024cv00843
Plaintiff:
Alisa Gerran, Lena Rogers, Kwan Scott and others
Defendant:
City of Ferguson, Marquis Jones and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00345
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Tapley v. Jones et al
as 2:2024cv00019
Plaintiff:
Derek Tapley
Defendant:
William Jones, Robert Embly and City of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tapley v. Jones et al
as 4:2024cv00257
Plaintiff:
Derek Tapley
Defendant:
William Jones, Robert Embly and City of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. Steele Police
as 1:2023cv00218
Plaintiff:
Matthew Jones
Defendant:
Steele Police
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv01426
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Reise et al v. City of Calverton Park, Missouri et al
as 4:2023cv01335
Plaintiff:
Christina Reise, Alan Miller, Sharon D Jones and others
Defendant:
City of Calverton Park, Sean Gibbons and City of Calverton Park, Missouri
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Simon v. Jones et al
as 4:2023cv00955
Plaintiff:
Yitzchak Simon
Defendant:
Tishaura Oneda Jones, Yusef Scoggin and Advantes Group LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
