Cases 1 - 10 of 182
King v. Morriss
as 5:2024cv06076
Petitioner:
Christopher M King
Respondent:
Kelly Morriss
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hall v. Dolgencorp, LLC et al
as 4:2024cv00344
Plaintiff:
Ashley Hall
Defendant:
Dolgencorp, LLC doing business as DOLLAR GENERAL STORE #18921, Andrew King, Lisa Stone and others
King v. The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company
as 4:2024cv00127
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey King
Defendant:
The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Porter v. King et al
as 6:2023cv03395
Plaintiff:
Anthony Porter
Defendant:
M King, VerPloeg, M Tizen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Vilsack et al
as 4:2023cv00946
Plaintiff:
James M Brown
Defendant:
Thomas J Vilsack and David L King
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
USA v. King
as 6:2023cv03392
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Ronald King
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 4246 Petition to Determine Present Mental Condition of Imprisoned Person
Trotter v. Miller et al
as 2:2023cv04240
Plaintiff:
Daniel Trotter
Defendant:
Wendy Marie Miller, Whithney Conney, Howard Michael and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Su v. Family Garden Inc
as 6:2023cv03359
Defendant:
Family Garden Inc a Missouri corporation doing business as Asian King Buffet formerly known as Great Garden Springfield Inc and Great Garden Springfield Inc
Plaintiff:
Julie A. Su
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv03353
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
King v. Esparza et al
as 6:2023cv03349
Plaintiff:
Antwoine R King
Defendant:
Jeffrey Esparza, Kathryn Merwald, Darryl Hairston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
