Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Five Rivers Carpenters, et al v. Covenant Construction Services, et al
as 23-3183
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Five Rivers Carpenters District Council Health and Welfare Fund, and Royce Peterson and Mike Novy as trustees and Five Rivers Carpenters District Council Educational Trust Fund, and David Unzeitig and Robert Doubek as trustees
Defendant / Appellant:
Covenant Construction Services, LLC and North American Specialty Insurance Company
Five Rivers Carpenters District Council Health and Welfare Fund et al v. Covenant Construction Services LLC et al
as 1:2022cv00025
Plaintiff:
Five Rivers Carpenters District Council Health and Welfare Fund, Royce Peterson, Mike Novy and others
Defendant:
Covenant Construction Services, LLC and North American Specialty Insurance Company
Interested Party:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145 E.R.I.S.A.: Delinquent Contributions
Jim-N-I v. David Boland et al
as 8:2003cv00035
Plaintiff:
Jim-N-I Inc., The United States of America For The Use and Benefit of doing business as Allied Steel, a Montana corporation
Defendant:
David Boland and Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 0270
Custom Concrete Inc v. David Boland Inc, et al
as 5:2002cv00209
Plaintiff:
Custom Concrete Inc
Defendant:
David Boland Inc and American Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270 Miller Act
B & H Asphalt Paving v. David Boland Inc, et al
as 5:2002cv00031
Plaintiff:
B & H Asphalt Paving Inc
Defendant:
David Boland Inc and American Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270 Miller Act
Kirby Specialties v. David Boland Inc, et al
as 5:2000cv00220
Plaintiff:
Kirby Specialties Corporation
Defendant:
David Boland Inc and American Insurance Company
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
National Fire Insurance Company of Hartford
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270 Miller Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
