Cases 41 - 50 of 520
Smith v. John or Jane Doe et al
as 0:2023cv01849
Plaintiff:
Jamal Lindsey Smith
Defendant:
John or Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Schall v. Drug Enforcement Agency
as 4:2023cv00398
Plaintiff:
Philip Andrew Schall
Defendant:
Drug Enforcement Agency
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Devin Nunes, et al v. Ryan Lizza, et al
as 23-2322
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Devin G. Nunes, NuStar Farms, LLC, Anthony Nunes, Jr. and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Ryan Lizza, Hearst Magazines, Inc. and Hearst Magazine Media, Inc.
LaDeaux v. JL Property Management et al
as 4:2023cv04084
Plaintiff:
Linda Lee LaDeaux
Defendant:
JL Property Management, Josh Utterback, Metastone Properties and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Melanie Wilson v. John Hussman, Sr.
as 23-1865
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Melanie R. Wilson
Defendant / Appellee:
John Hussman, Sr.
Brown et al v. RJ Prinja, LLC et al
as 2:2023cv02055
Plaintiff:
Elmo Maurice Brown, Chantae Davis and Chauntae Marie Davis
Defendant:
RJ Prinja, LLC, Melonia Ruth Prinja and Shawn Prinja
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Emrit v. Pratt et al
as 5:2023cv05041
Plaintiff:
Ronald Satish Emrit
Defendant:
Attorney Kara Pratt, Texas Supreme Court, Texas Bar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
George v. George
as 8:2023cv00056
Plaintiff:
Alexander A. George
Defendant:
Jeanie H. George and Ben Belmont
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Hans Niemann v. Sven Carlsen, et al
as 23-2216
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Hans Moke Niemann
Defendant / Appellee:
Sven Magnus Oen Carlsen, also known as Magnus Carlsen, Play Magnus AS, doing business as Play Magnus Group, Chess.com, LLC and others
Moyer v. Jackson et al
as 0:2023cv00138
Plaintiff:
Gregory Ashley Moyer
Defendant:
Shon Jackson and Koch Industries, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
