Cases 151 - 160 of 36,877
Boyles et al v. Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 4:2023cv00621
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Ann Boyles and Robert Boyles
Defendant:
Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc., DePuy Products, Inc., Depuy Synthes, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Bell v. Zimmer U.S. Inc.
as 4:2023cv00397
Plaintiff:
Danny Bell
Defendant:
Zimmer U.S. Inc. and Zimmer Biomet
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Bray v. Charles Ninneman and Colene Ninneman
as 4:2023cv00574
Plaintiff:
John Bray
Defendant:
Charles Ninneman and Colene Ninneman d/b/aImpact Fireworks, Charles Ninneman and Colene Ninneman doing business as Impact Fireworks and John Doe Importer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Lisko et al v. Mid-South Agricultural Equipment Inc et al
as 4:2023cv00757
Plaintiff:
Andy Lisko, Amy Lisko, Matt Perry and others
Defendant:
Mid-South Agricultural Equipment Inc, Crary Industries Inc, Bosch Rexroth Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
Emmel v. Future Motion, Inc.
as 0:2023cv02756
Plaintiff:
Christopher John Emmel
Defendant:
Future Motion, Inc.
Semmens v. Bates et al
as 4:2023cv00995
Plaintiff:
Michael W. Semmens, Sr.
Defendant:
Allan R. Bates and U-Haul Company of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Cunzeman v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2023cv02908
Plaintiff:
Lewis Cunzeman
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies LLC
Woods v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2023cv02887
Plaintiff:
Travis Woods
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Robinson v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2023cv02904
Plaintiff:
Dashad Robinson
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies LLC
Price v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2023cv02902
Plaintiff:
Dustin Price
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies LLC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
