Cases 141 - 150 of 3,808
William Lopez vs. United States of America
as 5:2023cv05179
Plaintiff:
William Murial Lopez
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Boswell v. Payne
as 4:2023cv00779
Plaintiff:
William J Boswell
Defendant:
Dexter Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mitchell v. Board of Corrections et al
as 4:2023cv00742
Plaintiff:
Robert S Mitchell
Defendant:
Board of Corrections and Post Prison Transfer Board
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Anderson v. Payne
as 4:2023cv00740
Plaintiff:
Myron Newjean Anderson, Jr
Defendant:
Dexter Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Matthews v. Washington County Jail et al
as 5:2023cv05163
Petitioner:
Drew Wilson Matthews
Respondent:
Washington County Jail and City of Fayetteville, Arkansas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Elbert v. USA
as 2:2023cv00201
Plaintiff:
James M Elbert, III
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Bradshaw v. Garrett
as 2:2023cv00170
Plaintiff:
Christopher Bradshaw
Defendant:
Doe and Chad Garrett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Ross v. Garrett
as 2:2023cv00176
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Alexander Ross
Defendant:
Chad Garrett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Howard v. Arkansas Division of Corrections
as 4:2023cv00752
Plaintiff:
Jesse James Howard
Defendant:
Arkansas Division of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Strawhacker v. Payne
as 4:2023cv00692
Plaintiff:
Lonnie Dolphus Strawhacker
Defendant:
Dexter Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
