Cases 11 - 20 of 19,829
Sherman v. Payne
as 4:2024cv00343
Plaintiff:
Patrick L Sherman
Defendant:
Dexter Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Barnes v. Crawford County Sheriff's Office et al
as 2:2024cv02077
Petitioner:
Eureka R. Barnes
Respondent:
Crawford County Sheriff's Office, Jason Cooper and Kevin Holmes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lindsey v. Harpstead et al
as 0:2024cv02290
Petitioner:
Dale Allen Lindsey
Respondent:
Jodi Harpstead and Nancy Johnston
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Moreno Casquete v. United States of America
as 0:2024cv02277
Petitioner:
Harinson Moreno Casquete
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Stokes v. Payne
as 4:2024cv00507
Plaintiff:
Lee E Stokes, Jr and Chango Kundalini
Defendant:
Dexter Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ways v. Allison
as 8:2024cv00219
Petitioner:
John Ways
Respondent:
Nicole Allison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Gallop v. Segal
as 0:2024cv01357
Petitioner:
Teresa Gallop
Respondent:
Michael Segal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Lobley v. Harris
as 4:2024cv00144
Petitioner:
Terrell Onterial Lobley
Respondent:
Don Harris
Interested Party:
Aaron Rogers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Keith v. Arkansas, State of et al
as 4:2024cv00503
Plaintiff:
Anthony Wayne Keith
Defendant:
Arkansas, State of, Michelle Gray and Dexter Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Evans v. Payne
as 4:2024cv00505
Plaintiff:
Cleveland Evans
Defendant:
Dexter Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
