Cases 1 - 10 of 113
Belyeu v. Pringle
as 3:2024cv00147
Respondent:
Chad Pringle
Petitioner:
Mark Andrew Belyeu
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Andrews v. Carlton
as 0:2024cv02799
Petitioner:
Norris Deshon Andrews
Respondent:
E.K. Carlton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Andrews v. Carlton
as 0:2024cv02797
Petitioner:
Norris Deshon Andrews
Respondent:
E.K. Carlton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Williams v. State of Minnesota et al
as 0:2024cv02548
Respondent:
Keith Ellison and State of Minnesota
Petitioner:
Andrew Stephen Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Nguyen v. McBee et al
as 4:2024cv00432
Defendant:
Andrew Bailey and Chris McBee
Petitioner:
Hong Thu Nguyen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Fields v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 4:2024cv00212
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Petitioner:
Andrew Fields, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Routh v. Johson
as 2:2024cv02079
Petitioner:
Robert Andrew Routh, Jr.
Respondent:
Judge Christine Johson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bradley v. Parson et al
as 4:2024cv00351
Defendant:
Andrew Bailey, Denise Welch-Masters, Brent Teichman and others
Plaintiff:
Trey Tarell Bradley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Glover v. State of Minnesota
as 0:2024cv01125
Petitioner:
Andrew Glover
Respondent:
State of Minnesota
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dixson v. Johnson
as 1:2024cv00031
Petitioner:
Antonio Dixson
Respondent:
Lt. Andrew Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
